CHINTAMANI SINGH Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2010-11-175
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on November 10,2010

Chintamani Singh Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD Sri Vinod Kumar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.B. Pandey and the learned Standing CounĀ­sel.
(2.) AT the very outset the petitioner has stated that due to inadvertence he has failed to array 'U.P. Hindi Sansthan' as a party in the array of opposite parties. He prays that he may be permitted to add 'U.P. Hindi Sansthan' in proper format as opposite party No. 3 during the course of the day. This is an innocuous prayer. It is not opposed, hence allowed.
(3.) U .P. Hindi Sansthan' may be arrayed as opposite party No. 3.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.