Raj Mani Chauhan, J. - (1.) Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned A.G.A. as well as perused the documents available on record.
(2.) This petition under Sec. of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the Petitioner for quashing the impugned order dated 30.8.2010, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/FTC -1, Hardoi in Criminal Revision No. 65 of 2010; Samundara Devi v/s. State of U.P. and Ors. whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has dismissed the revision filed by the Petitioner and maintained the order dated 20.2.2010, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -IV, Hardoi whereby he after disposal of the criminal case No. 3573 of 2004, on the application moved by opposite parties No. 3 and 4, has ordered for giving the house in Supurdgi to some other person as the earlier Supurdgar, who was husband of the Petitioner had died.
(3.) The submission of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is that on the written report of the complainant Om Prakash Gupta, who was husband of the Petitioner, the police of Police Station Mallawan, District Hardoi, registered a case under Ss. , I.P.C. at Case Crime No. 296 of 1988 against accused Jeet Bahadur, Amar Singh and Chandra Prakash. The Investigating Officer after investigation of the case had submitted charge sheet against the accused which gave rise to the criminal case No. 3573 of 2004. The accused were tried by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -IV, who vide judgment and order dated 22.4.2009 acquitted the accused. During the pendency of criminal case, the house in dispute was given in Supurdgi of the complainant Om Prakash Gupta, the husband of the Petitioner. After disposal of the criminal case, the opposite parties No. 3 and 4 moved an application before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate for possession of the house which was given in Supurdgi of complainant. The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, vide impugned order dated 20.2.2010, rejected the application and ordered that the house which was given in Supurdgi of complainant be given to some other person on appropriate terms. Against the impugned order dated 20.2.2010, the Petitioner preferred revision which was too dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/FTC -1, Hardoi.;