JUDGEMENT
S.K.TRIPATHI, J. -
(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. for the
respondent no. 2 and perused the record. None
is present for the respondent no. 1.
(2.) THIS is an application under section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings of criminal complaint case no. 373/IX-1987
under sections 417/420 I.P.C., Sant Saran
Gupta Vs. Dharmendra Singh and others
pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate-Ist
Class, Karvi, District Banda.
The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that according to the allegations
made in the complaint no criminal charge is
made out and the dispute is of civil nature.
The respondent no. 1 had given the dealership
on the basis of an agreement and if any breach
of the agreement was committed, the same
does not constitute the offences under sections 415, 417, 418, 420 and 120-B I.P.C.
(3.) IT appears that the respondent no. 1, Sant Saran Gupta is the proprietor of Sant
Agencies, Ganesh Bazar, Karvi. The applicant
nos. 1 and 3 are the proprietor of the
Hindustan Sales Corporation, Chandigarh and
the applicant no. 2 is the Manager of the
Hindustan Sales Corporation. An agreement
between the applicants and the respondent no.
1 took place whereby the applicants agreed to appoint the respondent no. 1 as their dealer for
supplying gas and the dealership continued for
certain period and when the applicants
stopped the supplies to the respondent no. 1,
he contacted the applicants and any how get
executed a fresh agreement and the dealership
thereafter continued on the basis of the fresh
agreement. But again, the applicants
committed breach of the agreement and failed
to supply despite taking security money of Rs.
10,000/-. In this way, the applicants committed forgery and cheated the respondent
no. 1.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.