JUDGEMENT
ANIL KUMAR, J. -
(1.) MATTER is taken in the revised cause list.
(2.) NONE appeared on behalf of the answering respondents.
Heard Sri U.S. Sahai, learned
counsel for the revisionist and perused the
record.
Facts in brief as submitted by the learned counsel for the revisionist are that
initially a regular suit (Suit No. 107 of
1994) filed by plaintiff/O.P. Nos. 1 to 18 in the court of IVth Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate/Additional Civil
Judge (Sr. Div.), Sultanpur in which the
present revisionists are defendants.
(3.) ON the basis of pleadings, the issues were framed by the trial court and
issue No. 5 and 6 are as under:-
(a) whether the present suit is barred in view of the provisions as provided under Section 22 of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. (b) Whether the present suit is barred as per the provisions as provided under Section 14 of Payment of Salaries Act, 1971. ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.