JUDGEMENT
R.K.Agrawal, J. -
(1.) These six revisions filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P., Lucknow, raises common question as to whether penalty under Section 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 can be levied upon the assessee-opposite party on the purchase of Gari Gola from outside the State of U.P. against declaration form C.
(2.) The assessee-opposite party is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act and is engaged in the business of Kerana, etc. It is specifically registered under the Central Sales Tax Act, as a dealer for kerana, colour food, drugs, dry fruits, seeds, kattha, supari, campher and chemicals.
(3.) According to the contention of the assessee-opposite party it had been importing Gari Gola against form C as Gari ka Gola is generally treated as an item of Kerana. It is sold by the Kerana dealers. The assessing officer had been permitting the assessee-opposite party to purchase Gari Gola against form C for the last several years, but on account of some audit objection for the assessment years 1981-82 to 1985-86 the penalty proceedings under Section 10 of the Act has been initiated and by separate orders penalty have been imposed. However, the Tribunal had held that penalty under Section 10-A of the Act is not exigible in the facts and circumstances. In the instant case there was no intention on the part of the assessee-opposite party to give any false declaration form C while importing Gari Gola against him. It was found that the assessee has been importing Gari Gola under the bona fide belief that it is an item of Kerana, even though it is liable to tax as oil seed being declared goods.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.