MAHESH KUMAR GARG Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2000-4-131
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (AT: LUCKNOW)
Decided on April 11,2000

MAHESH KUMAR GARG Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Pradeep Kant, J. - (1.) 'Child Labour' is a universally acknowledged problem with so un-proportionate and explosive dimensions that it had been a cause of serious concern since long and all Acts. Regulations and declarations made in this behalf had not been able to meet the challenge, effectively. The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for short) was promulgated looking to the fact that although there were number of Acts which prohibit the employment of children below 14 and 15 years in certain specified employment but there was no procedure laid down in any lay for deciding in which employment's occupations or processes, the employment of children should be banned. It was also found that there was also no law to regulate the working conditions of the children in most of the employments where they were not prohibited from working in exploitative conditions. The Act intended to : (i) to ban the employment of children i.e., those who have not completed their 14 years in specified occupations and processes; (ii) lay down a procedure to decide modifications to the schedule of banned occupations or processes; (iii) regulate the conditions of working of children and the employment where they are not prohibited from working; (iv) lay down enhanced penalties for employments of children in violation of the provisions of the Act and other Acts which prohibit the employment of children; (v) and to obtain uniformity in the definition of the child in the related laws.
(2.) With the aforesaid objects the Act was enforced wherein a person who has not completed 14 years of age was defined as a 'Child' under Section 2, Sub-clause (ii) of the Act. Section 2, Sub-clause (iv) defines establishment which includes a shop, commercial establishment, workshop for residential hostel, restaurant, eating house, theater or other place of public amusement or entertainment. In view of Section 2. Sub-clause (x) workshop means any premises (including the precints thereof) wherein any industrial process is carried on but does not include any premises, to which the provisions of Section 67 of the Factories Act, 1948 (Act No. 48 of 1948) for the time being, apply.
(3.) Part-II of the Act which contains Sections 3, 4 and 5 deals with the prohibition of the employment of children in certain occupations and process. Section 3 reads as under :- "3. Prohibition of employment of children in certain occupations and processes.--No child shall be employed or permitted to work in any of the occupations set forth in part A of the Schedule or in any Workshop wherein any of the processes set forth in part B of the Schedule is carried on : Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to any workshop wherein any process is carried by the occupier with the aid of his family or to any school established by, or receiving assistance or recognition from, Government.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.