I T C AGRO TECH LIMITED Vs. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX
LAWS(ALL)-2000-3-130
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on March 03,2000

I T C Agro Tech Limited Appellant
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX Respondents

JUDGEMENT

P.K.JAIN, J. - (1.) The revisionist is a public limited company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of refined edible oils manufactured from sunflower and mustard. It has its registered office in Secunderabad (State of Andhra Pradesh) and various depots in different States including the State of Uttar Pradesh, The goods are received in the depots and sold through such depots.
(2.) IN the assessment year 1994 -95 ex parte assessment order was framed and tax liability was determined at the rate of 10 per cent. The assessment proceedings were reopened under Section 30 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter called 'the Act') and books of accounts were accepted, tax liability was imposed at the rate of 2.5 per cent. Similarly assessment for the assessment year 1995 -96 was completed and tax liability was imposed at the rate of 2.5 per cent. However, the assessing authority later on felt that rate of tax was wrongly applied to the turnover of the assessee in both the assessment years and, therefore, issued notices under Section 22 for rectification of the error. The notices were contested by the dealer mainly on the ground that the oils sold by the dealer are covered by entry 31, clause (a) of the Notification No. ST -3366 dated September 28, 1993, on which the rate of tax was 2.5 per cent inclusive of additional tax. It was also the contention of the assessee that rectification under Section 22 was not permissible merely on the basis of change of opinion. The assessing authority placing reliance upon the decision of this Court as affirmed by the honourable Supreme Court in B.P. Oil Mills Ltd., Agra v. Sales Tax Tribunal [1998] 111 STC 188 ; 1998 UPTC 1020 levied the tax at the rate of 10 per cent. First appeals and second appeals filed by the dealer were dismissed hence, these two revisions:
(3.) SRI Bharat Ji Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Piyush Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the revisionist and Sri S.P. Kesarvani, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the revenue have been heard.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.