KHANU Vs. AKBAR
LAWS(ALL)-2000-7-55
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on July 12,2000

KHANU Appellant
VERSUS
AKBAR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD Sri S. R. Rizvi, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jagdish Prasad Mauriya, the learned counsel for the opposite par ties and perused the record including the order dated 30-5-2000 passed in this case.
(2.) THE petitioner Khanu, father of Najma appears to have lodged FIR against Akbar and others to the effect that they kidnapped, Najma, aged about 13 years and were keeping her in wrongful confinement. THE matter appears to be under police inves tigation. In the meantime, the petitioner filed this present habeas corpus petition al leging that Najma is being wrongfully con fined by the opposite parties. It appears that in compliance with the order of this Court, in this petition Najma and Akbar appeared before the Court on 30-5-2000 and she said that Akbar was her husband. Counter-affidavit has been filed to the effect that Najma is aged about 19 years and she is legally wedded wife of opposite party No. 1. Medical certificate about the age of petitioner obtained from the C. M. O. Badaun is being filed by the op posite parties for saying that Najma is 19 years. The father of Najma has not filed any rejoinder-affidavit, to controvert the assertion made in the counter-affidavit that Najma is 19 years. The learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that Akbar and Najma should be directed to appear before the investigating officer for medical ex amination of Najma for purpose of ascer taining the age of the petitioner. In reply to it the learned counsel for the opposite parties has submitted that once this Court finds that Najma is not in wrongful con finement and is apparently 19 years of age as opined by one of the doctor. No further direction can be given and the habeas cor pus petition deserves to be dismissed.
(3.) AFTER considering the respective submissions and the material on record, I am of the view that this habeas corpus petition deserves to be dismissed because the lady namely Najma has herself said before this Court that the opposite party No. 1 Akbar is her husband and because she is said to be legally wedded wife of Akbar and appears to be of 19 years of age as per the medical report submitted by the C. M. O. Badaun, The inves tigation is going on and it is expected that Najma and all concerned will co- operate with the investigating agency and the power of the investigating officer as he may have under the law will not be fettered by the order, that are being passed in this habeas corpus petition. In other words, if the investigating officer finds it that further medical examination is needed in with the investigation of the case he win be free to exercise his power as these may be with him for ascertaining the truth as is contained in the FIR. In these circumstances, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed. Petition dismissed. .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.