- (1.) R. H. Zaidi, J. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondents from interfering in the functioning of the petitioner on the post of ad-hoc Principal of the institution, known as, Shiv Intermediate College, Katehara, post office Katehara, district Allahabad and to declare the provisions of Rule 12 of the U. P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Rules, 1998 as null and void.
(2.) IT has been stated that the petitioner was initially appointed as Assistant Teacher in C. T. Grade. The college was, thereafter, upgraded and the petitioner was appointed as Lecturer (History) on 12-12-1975 on ad-hoc basis for a period of six months which was extended from time to time. IT has also been stated that on account of managerial dispute between the two rival Committees of Management, the salary of the petitioner has not been paid and the petitioner is not being permitted to function as ad-hoc Principal of the College. Hence, the present petition. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was legally entitled to continue to function as ad-hoc Principal of the College as there was no legally selected and appointed candidate to take over charge of the office of the Principal. It has also been urged that Rule 12 of the U. P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Rules, 1998 provides no guidelines, the same is therefore, arbitrary and illegal. I have considered the submissions made by learned Counsel for the petitioner.
(3.) ACCORDING to his own case, the petitioner was appointed as Lecturer in History on ad-hoc basis for a period of six months which, according to him, used to be extended from time to time. It has also been stated that on retirement of the permanent Principal of the College, the petitioner was appointed as Principal on ad-hoc basis in the year 1999 and that his appointment was also approved by the District Inspector of Schools in the aforesaid capacity. On the record of the writ petition, nothing has been brought by the petitioner to show that anybody was interfering in the functioning of the petitioner was the Principal of the College in ad-hoc capacity, the petitioner, therefore, has got no cause of action for the relief claimed by him and to restrain the respondents from interfering in the functioning of the petitioner as Principal of the College on ad-hoc basis. So far as the validity of the Rule 12 of the U. P. Secondary Education Services Selection Board Rules, 1998 is concerned, it provides as detailed procedure and exhaustive guidelines for recruitment of Principals of Intermediate Colleges, Head Masters, Teachers and Lecturers of High Schools. It provides for advertisement of the vacancies specifying categories thereof in the daily newspapers having wide circulation in the State inviting the applications for being considered for selection in the proforma published in the advertisement. Provision for specifying the institution where candidates are to be appointed requiring the candidates give their choice for not more than three institutions in order of preference. Said rule provides for scrutiny of the applications and also provides for written examination consisting of one paper of general aptitude test of two hours based on the subject at the centres to be fixed in the district headquarters. The method of evaluation of answer-sheets through examiners or through computer has also been made. The manner of allotment of marks for the post of Head Master and Principals has also been provided besides other necessary details and guidelines. Therefore, the submissions made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, to the contrary, cannot be accepted. I do not find any illegality in the aforesaid rule. The same is thus, held to be quite valid and ultra vires. No case for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is made out. The writ petition fails and is dismissed. Petition dismissed. .;