JUDGEMENT
M.Katju, J. -
(1.) This writ petition has been filed against the impugned order of dismissal dated 23.1.1987 Annexure-7 to the petition and the order dated 30.10.1987 dismissing the appeal vide Annexure-8 to the writ petition and the impugned order dated 12.11.1993 passed by the U. P. Public Service Tribunal Annexure-9 to the petition dismissing the petitioner's claim petition.
(2.) Heard learned counsel for the parties.
(3.) The petitioner was appointed as constable in the year 1980 after a selection against a permanent post in the G.R.P. constable cadre. It is alleged in paragraph 2 of the petition that he served the department sincerely, honestly and diligently at Fatehpur railway station. However, on 24.4.1986 the petitioner was served with a charge-sheet by the Dy. S. P., Railways, Varanasi, alleging that on 10.1.1986 the petitioner was on duty on three platforms, i.e., platform Nos. 1, 2 and 3 at Fatehpur railway station from 6 p.m. to 12 night. On that very day. i.e., on 10.1.1986 at about 11.24 p.m. Toofan Express came from Kanpur and stopped for five minutes at Fatehpur station. One Smt. Lilawati who was suffering from labour pain alighted al Fatehpur railway station along with her luggage, but her husband could not get down from the train at Fatehpur and the train started. It is alleged that Smt. Lilawati was tortured and murdered but the petitioner did not report about this incident although he arrived back from his duty at 0.15 a.m. on 11.1.1986 at G.R.P. station Fatehpur. It is alleged that due to his negligence, Smt. Lilawati was misbehaved with and murdered. True copy of the charge-sheet is Annexure-1 to the petition. In paragraph 4 of the petition it is stated that there is no mention in the charge-sheet about the time and place of the incident and the details about the alleged misbehaviour with Smt. Lilawati.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.