OM PRAKASH Vs. STATE OF U P
LAWS(ALL)-2000-1-40
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on January 29,2000

OM PRAKASH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) RAM Janam Singh, J. These are two references made by Additional Commissioner Meerut by his order dated 19-7-1996 passed in Revision No. 16 of 1994-95 and 22 of 1995-96 arising out of a proceeding for grant of allotment con cerning fishing rights.
(2.) BRIEFLY the facts of the case are that Gaon Sabha Rastam granted allotment for fishing rights in favour of Om Prakash on 30-12-1985 for a period of loyears. On the expiry of the term the lease was renewed on the report of Tahsildar. Against the renewal of allotment Dharampal moved an application on which notices were or dered to be issued on 6-11-1995 to the allottee. Revision No. 16of 94-95 was filed against this order. On 4-12- 1995 S. D. O. withdrew the renewal order. Revision No. 22 of 1995- 96 was filed against this order. The learned Additional Commissioner decided both the revisions by a single order and recommended that both the orders passed by S. D. O. beset aside. I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the records carefully. The learned Additional Commis sioner considered the matter properly and found that renewal had been done after complying with the law on the subject. He has expressed an opinion that the S. D. O. had no power to withdraw the renewal order. After a careful perusal of the file, I am of the view that the recommendation made by Additional Commissioner is just and proper and there is no need to inter fere with it.
(3.) AGREEING with the recommenda tion, I accept the reference, allow the revision set aside the order dated 6-11-1995 and 4- 12-1995. This order will govern Reference No. 130-Aof95-96/districtsaharanpur. Revision allowed. .;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.