JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE revision petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in the original suit filed this revision petition against the order dated 14.11.2007 made in
I.A.No.391 of 2006 in O.S.No.399 of 2006 on the file of Principal
District Munsif Court, Polur.
(2.) FOR the sake of convenience, the plaintiffs in the original suit are referred as revision petitioners and the defendants in the original suit
are referred as respondents hereafter.
The revision petitioners filed a suit for partition of their 6/20 shares in three items of the suit schedule property. In the above said
suit, a preliminary decree was passed on 15.04.2004. As per preliminary
decree, an application in I.A.No.266 of 2005 was filed for passing final
decree. In the above said final decree proceedings, an Advocate
Commissioner was appointed and he had filed his report. After that the
revision petitioner filed an application in I.A.No.391 of 2006 under
Order 6 Rule 17 CPC to amend the schedule of properties and other
coloumns in the plaint as follows: -
''LANGUAGE ''
(3.) IN the above said affidavit filed by the revision petitioners, it is stated that a preliminary decree was passed on 15.04.2004 and as per the
preliminary decree, the revision petitioners have filed an application
for passing final decree in I.A.No.266 of 2005 in which, an Advocate
Commissioner was also appointed. In the above said Commissioner filed his
report in which, it is stated that in the 1st item, there is no tiled
house and it is vacant site and also the eastern boundary not tallied
with plaint schedule. It is also averred in the affidavit that the
Commissioner also stated in his report that as per preliminary decree,
2nd item is vacant site but, in the above said item, there is a concrete house. It is also stated in the affidavit that the respondents have
changed the super -structure as found by the Commissioner, since the
revision petitioners are living far away from the properties and hence,
they are not aware of the fact and also unable to inform to the counsel
immediately and therefore, prayed for to amend the plaint as already
stated.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.