JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) EVEN though, the interim applications are listed before me, by consent, the Writ Petitions themselves are taken up for the final hearing.
(2.) THE core issue involved in all these Writ Petitions is as to whether the third respondent can be permitted to lay the transmission towers over a public cart track by providing dedicated transmission lines for the purpose of connecting it with the sub-station. Since the grievances of the petitioners in all the Writ Petitions are one and the same against the same respondents, they have been taken up together and a common order is passed.
In order to decide the issues involved in these five Writ Petitions, the factual matrix surrounding the case requires a proper narration.
Heard Shri.V.Raghavachari and Shri.N.Subramanian, learned counsels appearing for the petitioners and Shri.K.V.Dhanapalan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2, Shri.P.S.Raman, learned senior counsel appearing for the third respondent as well as Shri.Vijay Narayan, learned senior counsel appearing for the fourth respondent and perused the entire materials available on record. Facts in brief:
(3.) THE third respondent is a generating Company engaged in manufacture, erection and operation of wind turbines. THE electricity generated by the third respondent is to be sold to the State Electricity Board at the rate of Rs.3.39/- per unit, after the commencement of production. THE State Electricity Board has been purchasing the electricity for much higher price from the open market due to insufficient power as the State is facing a power crunch. As per the agreement entered into between the third respondent and the State Electricity authorities, the power generation produced by the third respondent will have to be connected to the sub-station. THE third respondent has got exemption from obtaining a licence under the Act, namely, the Electricity Act, 2003 as per the Electricity [Removal of Difficulty] (fifth) Order, 2005. Permission has also been obtained from the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation wholly owned by the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. When the third respondent made attempts to lay the towers and overhead lines through the private lands, objections have been raised by the owners. THErefore, an alternative route was envisaged, by which, it was decided to take the overhead lines by constructing towers which are six in numbers and through the government cart track along with its overhead lines.
The third respondent made an application to the first respondent, District Collector seeking a no objection certificate. After obtaining a no objection certificate from the local Panchayat, the second respondent made an inspection along with the Revenue Inspector, Village Administrative Officer and Village Assistant and thereafter, sent a report to the first respondent recommending for no objection certificate as there is no hindrance to use the cart track for taking men, cattle and vehicles. The third respondent has also completed the substantial work of erecting 43 towers excluding the six towers which are to be laid along with the government cart track. Objections from the public have been heard by the respondents 1 and 2 after issuing a public notice.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.