JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application is filed seeking bail und er Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in
respect of the offences punishable under Sections 40 6,
420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code for which FIR came to be registered at C.R. No.I- 34 of 2015 with Infocity Police Station, Gandhinagar.
(2.) This Court has heard the learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. During the course of
the hearing, it is pointed out that the co-accused has deposited the entire disputed
amount of Rs.1,10,00,000/-(Rs. One Crore and Ten Lakhs), which
came to be transferred to the trial Court by an order
dated 20.10.2016 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 5330 of 2016 which was preferred
by the co- accused. On the condition of such deposit, regular bail was admitted to
the co-accused Rasikbhai Amratbhai Jaiswal.
2.1 Said Rasikbhai has filed an affidavit inter alia stating that the said deposit may be considered as the deposit made by the present accused as well.
2.2 Learned counsel for the complainant under the instructions from the client submitted that, the complainant has no objection for admitting the petitioner to anticipatory bail in light of the above referred facts. He also contended that the the private properties are negotiating for settlement.
2.3 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that under the protection of this Court, the petitioner had appeared before the Investigating Officer who has already recorded his statement and thereafter since last about one year, the petitioner has not been requisitioned by the Investigating Officer.
2.4 Considering the totality of the above circumstances, in the opinion of this Court, the case for admitting the petitioner to anticipatory bail is made out. The petitioner is ordered to be admitted to anticipatory bail.
(3.) Learned Advocate for the applicant on instructions states that the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions, including
impositions of conditions with regard to the powers of
Investigating Agency to file an application before the competent court for his remand. He
would further submit that upon filing of such application by the
Investigating Agency, the right of applicant accused
to oppose such application on merits may be kept open.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.