JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)By way of this petition, the petitioner -detenue has challenged the order of detention dated 15th October 2014
passed by the District Magistrate, Surat, in exercise of powers
conferred on him under sub -section(1) of Section 3 of the
Gujarat Prevention of Antisocial Activities Act, 1985 (for short,
'the PASA Act') and has also prayed for an order to set him free
from detention.
(2.)I take notice of the fact that the petitioner has been detained as a 'bootlegger'. I also take notice of the fact that in
the grounds of detention order dated 15 th October 2014, the
detaining authority has relied upon one case registered with
the Mandvi Police Station vide III -CR No.433 of 2014 for the
offence punishable under Sections 66(1)B, 65AE, 116(2) and
81 of the Prohibition Act. Section 2(b) of the PASA Act defines the term
'bootlegger', which reads as under: -
"S.2(b) "bootlegger" means a person who distills,
manufactures, stores, transports, imports,
exports, sells or distributes any liquor, intoxicating
drug or other intoxicant in contravention of any
provision of the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949
(Bom.XXV of 1949) and the rules and orders made
thereunder, or of any other law for the time being
in force or who knowingly expends or applies any
money or supplies any animals, vehicle, vessel or
other conveyance or any receptacle or any other
material whatsoever in furtherance or support of
the doing of any of the things described above by
or through any other person, or who abets in any
other manner the doing of any such thing."
Section 3 of the PASA Act speaks about the power to
make orders detaining certain persons. It reads as under:
"Sec.3 Power to make orders detaining certain
persons:
(1) The State Government may if satisfied with
respect to any person that with a view to
preventing him from acting in any manner
prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, it is
necessary so to do, make an order directing that
such person be detained.
(2) If having regard to the circumstances
prevailing or likely to prevail in any area within the
local limits of the jurisdiction of a District
Magistrate or a Commissioner of Police, the State
Government is satisfied that it is necessary so to
do, it may, by order in writing, direct that the
District Magistrate or the Commissioner of Police,
may also, if satisfied as provided in sub -section
(1), exercise the powers conferred by the said sub -
section.
(3) When any order is made under this section by
an authorised officer, he shall forthwith report the
fact to the State Government, together with the
grounds on which the order has been made and
such other particulars as, in his opinion, has a
bearing on the matter, and no such order shall
remain in force for more than twelve days after
the making thereof, unless, in the meantime, it
has been approved by the State Government.
(4) For the purpose of this section, a person shall
be deemed to be "acting in any manner prejudicial
to the maintenance of public order" when such
person is engaged in or is making preparation for
engaging in any activities, whether as a
bootlegger or dangerous person or drug offender
or immoral traffic offender or property grabber,
which affect adversely or are likely to affect
adversely the maintenance of public order.
(3.)Explanation: - For the purpose of this sub -section, public order shall be deemed to have been
affected adversely or shall be deemed likely to be
affected adversely inter alia if any of the activities
of any person referred to in this sub -section
directly or indirectly, is causing or is likely to
cause any harm, danger or alarm or feeling of
insecurity among the general public or any section
thereof or a grave or widespread danger to life,
property or public health."
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.