JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) LEARNED advocate for the petitioner prays to amend the cause -title. Permission is granted to do so forthwith.
Perused the petition, materials supplied to the detenu,
detention order and affidavit -in -reply filed by the detaining
authority and heard learned advocate Mr.H.B. Raval for Ms.H.V.
Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.P.
Ms.Jyoti Bhatt for the respondent -State.
(2.) THIS petition under z 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order of detention dated 31.8.2013
passed by the respondent authority in exercise of powers
conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti
Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short the Act) by detaining the
detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under Section 2(b) of the
Act.
Learned advocate for the detenue submits that order of detention impugned in this petition deserves to be quashed
and set aside on the ground that one offence registered
against the detenu before the concerned police station vide
C.R. No.253 of 2013 for the offences punishable under Sections
66(b), 65(a)(e), 116(b) and 81 of Prohibition Act is not of such magnitude and intensity as to have the effect of disturbing the
public order so as to pass an order under Section 3(1) of the
PASA Act. Learned advocate for the petitioner has further
submitted that the detaining authority has not applied its mind
to the vital facts and there was non -application of mind before
recording the order of detention.
(3.) LEARNED A.G.P. for the respondent -State supported the detention order passed by the authority and submitted that
sufficient material and evidence was found during the course
of investigation, which was also supplied to the detenue,
indicating that the detenue is in the habit of indulging into
activities as defined under Section 2(b) of the Act and,
considering the facts of the case, the detaining authority has
rightly passed the order of detention and the detention order
deserves to be upheld by this Court. For such submission, the
learned A.G.P. took me through the grounds upon which
detaining authority satisfied to detain the petitioner.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.