JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)Heard learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.
(2.)The present petition is directed against order of detention dated 25.09.2021 passed by the
respondent - detaining authority in exercise of
powers conferred under section 3(2) of the Gujarat
Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for
short "the Act") by detaining the petitioner -
detenue as 'dangerous person' as defined under
section 2(c) of the Act.
(3.)Learned advocate for the detenue submits that the order of detention impugned in this petition
deserves to be quashed and set aside on the ground
that registration of the two FIRs, the details of
which are given in the order of detention, under the
provisions of the Indian Penal Code , by itself,
cannot bring the case of the detenue within the
purview of definition under section 2(c) of the Act.
Further, learned advocate for the detenue submits
that illegal activity likely to be carried out or
alleged to have been carried out, as alleged, cannot
have any nexus or bearing with the maintenance of
public order and at the most, it can be said to be
breach of law and order. Further, except statement
of witnesses, registration of above FIR/s and
Panchnama drawn in pursuance of the investigation, no
other relevant and cogent material is on record
connecting alleged anti-social activity of the
detenue with breach of public order. Learned
advocate for the petitioner further submits that it
is not possible to hold on the basis of the facts of
the present case that activity of the detenue with
respect to the criminal cases had affected even tempo
of the society causing threat to the very existence
of normal and routine life of people at large or that
on the basis of criminal cases, the detenue had put
the entire social apparatus in disorder, making it
difficult for whole system to exist as a system
governed by rule of law by disturbing public order.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.