FALGUN K PATEL; PAWAN GIRI Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANOTHER
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Falgun K Patel; Pawan Giri
State of Uttarakhand and another
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Since both the applications, moved under
Section 482 of Cr.P.C., involve common facts,
therefore, these are being decided by this common
judgment and order for the sake of convenience /
(2.) The applicants, by means of present
applications under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seek to
quash and set aside the impugned charge-sheet as well
as summoning orders dated 01.12.2012, passed by
Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) / Judicial Magistrate,
Roorkee, District Haridwar in criminal case no. 3286 of
2012, State vs Falgun K. Patel and others (case crime
no. 110 of 2011), under Sections 420, 384, 120-B of
IPC, which relates to police station Bhagwanpur,
(3.) An FIR was lodged by respondent no. 2
Satbir Moolchand Sehrawat against Sanjeev Kumar,
Champa Lal, Abha Sinha, Pawan Giri, Falgun Patel,
Sandeep Gupta, Ravi Gupta, Naresh Gupta, Subhash
Gupta, Praveen Teotiya on 23.05.2011 in police station,
Bhagwanpur, Roorkee, District Haridwar, which was
registered as case crime no. 110 of 2011, under
Sections 120-B, 304, 420, 407, 468 and 471 of IPC.
After the investigation, a charge-sheet in respect of
offences punishable under Sections 420, 384 and 120B
of IPC was submitted against the accused persons.
Cognizance was taken on the said charge-sheet and
accused persons were summoned to face the trial for the
offences complained of against them. Aggrieved
against submission of charge-sheet and passing of
summoning order, present applications under Section
482 of Cr.P.C. were filed by the applicants.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.