U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs. LABOUR COURT, U P DEHRADUN
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Labour Court, U P Dehradun
Click here to view full judgement.
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. -
(1.) THIS writ petition was dismissed for non -prosecution on 3.1.2012. Now a restoration application has been filed along with delay condonation application. Reasons assigned in the delay condonation
application seem to be bona fide. Delay condonation application (CLMA No.
1003 of 2012) is allowed. Delay in filing the restoration application is condoned.
(2.) REASONS assigned in the restoration application seem to be bona fide. Restoration application (MCC No. 69 of 2012) is allowed. Order
dated 3.1.2012 is hereby recalled. The matter is restored to its original
(3.) HEARD Mr. Rajeev Bisht, Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Kishore Kumar, Counsel for respondent no. 2 on merit.
The petitioner is U.P. State Road Transport Corporation which is aggrieved by an award of labour court passed in favour of
workman/respondent no.2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent no.2
was a workman in the office of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation at
Dehradun and was working as a sweeper and though he was a part time
workman work of eight hours was taken by him as was taken from regular
employee of the said corporation. Therefore the exact reference which was
made by the labour court was that whether respondent no.2 is entitled for
equal pay for equal work for same and the award was given in his favour.
Since the workman/respondent no.2 works for eight hours as done by a
regular employee of the said corporation, he is entitled for the same
wages and therefore the said award was passed.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.