SANJAY SHARMA Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Accused applicant has moved this bail application
seeking regular bail in case crime no. 246 of 2012 under Section
302, 394, 411 IPC, police station Jwalapur District Haridwar.
(2.) Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate for the applicant, has
vehemently argued that as per the prosecution story itself,
applicant Sanjay Sharma neither entered into the house of
complainant nor committed murder of Smt. Sunita Mishra nor
committed any loot in the house of complainant. He further
contends that after committing the loot and murder, other coaccused namely Jasvinder @ Tonu and Monu Mishra handed
over the looted items to the applicant, therefore, no offence
punishable under Section 394, 302 IPC is made out against the
applicant, however, the only offence which can be said to have
been made out against the applicant is offence punishable
under Section 411 IPC. He further submits that applicant is in
jail with effect from 25.07.2012 and he has no criminal history.
(3.) Learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand also
submits that applicant has no criminal antecedent.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.