ROHIT KUMAR SACHDEVA Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Rohit Kumar Sachdeva
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click here to view full judgement.
PRAFULLA C.PANT, J. -
(1.) URGENCY Application No. 470 of 2013 is
(2.) HEARD .
By means of this petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report dated
17.01.2013, registered as Crime/FIR No. 3 of 2013, relating to offences punishable under Section 498A and
420 of I.P.C., at Police Station Kankhal, District Haridwar.
(3.) IT is alleged by the respondent No.3 Nisha Sachdeva (complainant) that her husband (present
petitioner) fraudulently, got her signatures in the divorce
papers. Learned counsel for the petitioner pleaded that the
impugned First Information Report has been lodged only
due to matrimonial discord between the respondent No.3
and the petitioner, as it appears that respondent No.3 is no
more interested in prosecuting the petition filed under
Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It is further
argued that there was no occasion on the part of the
petitioner to fraudulently obtain signatures of the
respondent No.3 in the divorce papers as both of them
were living separately from each other.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.