SAVITRI VERMA Vs. RANJIT SINGH
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Click here to view full judgement.
B.S.VERMA, J. -
(1.) THIS appeal was finally decided on 18.7.2011. Against the order,
a review application was moved by the respondent no.2 Insurance Company
on the ground that on that date Sri Pankaj Purohit, Advocate for
respondent no.2 was not present in the Court but inadvertently presence
of said counsel was recorded in the judgment on behalf of insurance
company. By the order dated 28.03.2012, review application has been
(2.) THEREFORE , today this appeal is again taken up for hearing.
(3.) BRIEF facts of the case have been mentioned in the judgment and award passed by this Court on 18.7.2011 which was set aside on review
application filed by respondent no.2 Insurance company. The same are need
not to be reiterated and are treated part of this judgment.
Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.