FARAHAT SAHID Vs. UTTARAKHAND GOVERNMENT
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Click here to view full judgement.
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. -
(1.) HEARD Mr. Gopal Dutt Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Subhash Upadhayay, Standing Counsel for the State.
(2.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, he has technical knowledge of operating the Printing Press Offset Machine. In response to an
advertisement dated 26.02.2003 published by the District Panchayat Raj
Officer, Pithoragarh/respondent no.2, the petitioner applied for the post
of Offset Printer Operator. The advertisement states that initially for
the first year, the incumbent would be given a salary of Rs.5,000/ - per
month and after one year of satisfactory service, the regular salary,
which is approved by the Government, would be given.
(3.) THE petitioner underwent a selection process and thereafter appointed as Offset Press Operator by the Manager of the District Central
Printing Press Panchayat, Pithoragarh / respondent no.3.
According to the petitioner, he continued to work as Offset Press Operator for a period of six years and, inspite of his repeated
requests, he has not been given regular salary and, on his persistent
requests for granting regular salary, his services were terminated
without assigning any reason vide impugned order dated 02.03.2009. This
Court has perused the impugned order and feels that it does not assign
any reason for terminating the services of the petitioner. The impugned
order only says that the appointment of the petitioner was totally
temporary in nature and his service was not required any more.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.