MATLOOB Vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION
Click here to view full judgement.
B.S.VERMA, J. -
(1.) MR . Lok Pal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Mr. Anirudh Bhatt, Brief Holder for respondent no.1, Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate
for respondent nos.5/1 to 5/3 and Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate for
respondent nos.6/1 to 6/5 and 7.
(2.) BY means of this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the judgment and order dated
18.12.1998 passed by Assistant Director of Consolidation, Muzaffarnagar, Camp at Roorkee, whereby the chak no.59 allotted to Zaheer has been
(3.) BRIEFLY stated, the facts of the case, giving rise to this writ petition are, that Zaheer was alloted chak no.59 by the
Consolidation Officer (for short, C.O.). Said chak no.59 was purchased by
the petitioners from Zaheer by a registered sale deed dated 6.10.1998.
Against the allotment of chak, revision no.204 was preferred by Sayeed
Ahmed before the Assistant Director of Consolidation. Two revisions
bearing nos.205 and 245 were also preferred before the Assistant Director
of Consolidation. All these revisions were heard and disposed of by a
common judgment and order dated 18.12.1998. In revision no.204, chak
no.59 alloted to Zaheer has been changed. Feeling aggrieved, this writ
petition has been filed by the petitioners.
The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners were not made party in the revision and before passing of the impugned
judgment and order no opportunity of hearing was afforded either to
Zaheer or to the petitioners.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.