SUDHA PANT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click here to view full judgement.
PRAFULLA C.PANT, J. -
(1.) URGENCY application no. 747 of 2013 is allowed.
(2.) HEARD .
By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioners have
sought quashing of the first information report
registered as crime no. 29 of 2013, relating to offences
punishable under section 323, 504, 506, 498A IPC and
one punishable under section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition
Act, 1961, at Police Station Kotwali Ranipur, District
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners submitted that respondent no. 3 Reena and petitioner no. 3 Pradeep
Pant are already in litigation under section 125 Cr.P.C,
under section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act and under
section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act. It is contended that due to said
matrimonial discord respondent no. 3 has implicated
the petitioners in the impugned FIR to pressurize them
in the litigations pending between respondent no. 3 and
petitioner no. 3. No specific role has been assigned to
the petitioner no. 1 and 2. Specific allegations are made
only against the husband (petitioner no. 3). It is also
pleaded that petitioner no. 1 and 2 live separately from
their son. It is also pleaded in the writ petition that
respondent no. 3 under the influence of his Spiritual
Guru Nardev Kothari is not ready to join the company
of her husband.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.