SUSHILA DEVI Vs. DISTRICT PROGRAM OFFICER, RUDRAPRAYAG AND OTHERS
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
District Program Officer, Rudraprayag And Others
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and
learned Brief Holder for the State. Also perused the papers
(2.) It transpires that an advertisement dated
2.8.2010 was published for recruitment of Angan Bari
Karyakarti and Mini Angan Bari Karyakarti in various
Angan Bari Centers of District Rudraprayag. Petitioner Smt.
Sushila Devi applied in pursuance of the said advertisement
for her appointment as Angan Bari Karyakarti in Angan
Bari Centre Badav, Tehsil Ukhimath, District Rudraprayag.
(3.) Grievance of the petitioner is that though she
fulfilled all the necessary qualification prescribed for the
said post and was thus eligible for appointment as such, yet
the concerned authority appointed one Smt. Indu Devi,
whose matrimonial house is at village Hyundali, Patwari
Circle Bhatwari. It has been contended that as per the
prescribed rules, governing the said appointment, only
those persons, who are resident of village Badav, shall be
considered for appointment to any post concerning the 2
Angan Bari Centre Badav. But Smt. Indu Devi, claiming
herself to be the resident of village Badav, got appointment
to the said post. It is the contention of learned Counsel for
the petitioner that notwithstanding the fact that the
husband of Smt. Indu Devi has died, after her marriage in
village Hyundali, she ought to have been treated as resident
of the said village and not that of village Badav.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.