BABITA Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) By means of this petition, a prayer has been made to
quash the order of cognizance dated 22.11.2007 rendered by
Sessions Judge, Haridwar in Criminal Revision No. 424 of 2007
titled as Babita Vs. State of Uttarakhand. In the said revision,
learned Sessions Judge confirmed the order dated 10.09.2007
passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar in Misc. Case
No. 281 of 2007 titled as Babita Vs. Harita Rani and others.
(2.) Babita moved an application under Section 156 (3)
Cr.P.C. to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar seeking a
direction for registration of case against Harita Rani, Padam
Singh and Vinod Kumar. The allegations were that Padam
Singh, Pradhan of the village concerned, who was succeeded by
another Pradhan Harita Rani, in connivance with Vinod
Kumar, Gram Panchayat Development Officer made
fabrication in village development record and paid
Government money through vouchers no. 36 39 to different
persons, who did not do any work on the dates for which they
were paid by the Pradhan. Babita is resident of same village
whereof Harita Rani and Padam Singh were Pradhan.
(3.) Learned Magistrate did not find any reason to
direct the police to register a case so he rejected the application.
Learned Sessions Judge also did not agree with the grounds of 2
revision, so he dismissed the revision. Learned Sessions Judge
dismissed the said revision on one of the grounds inter alia that
during the arguments submitted before him he was made
aware that a case had already been registered by the local
police in compliance of the Magistrate s order dated 10.07.2007.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.