SANDEEP KASHYAP & OTHERS Vs. REENA DEVI
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANDEEP KASHYAP And OTHERS
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) None appeared on behalf of the respondent even
in the revised call. Hence, this Court extended hearing to
learned Counsel for the applicants.
(2.) The challenge in this petition is to the order of
cognizance dated 16.10.2009, passed by the Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Haridwar in Complaint Case No. 2911/2009,
Smt. Reena v. Sandeep Kashyap & Others, whereby the
accused applicants have been summoned to stand trial for
the offences under Section 323, 498A IPC and Section 3/4
of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
(3.) Facts, in brief, are that the respondent Smt.
Reena was wedded with Sandeep Kashyap on 7.7.2007.
After a few months of their marriage, differences cropped
up between the couple. So, Smt. Reena was constrained to
leave her matrimonial house and came to reside with her
parents. There she lodged an FIR against the accused
applicants for the offences under Section 323, 498A, 504,
506 IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Subsequently, compromise took place between the parties
and investigation ended into submission of the final report
on 26.12.2007 on the basis of said compromise.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.