DEVENDRA JOSHI Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
State of Uttarakhand and Ors
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Heard Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for the
petitioner, Mr. N.S. Pundir, Brief Holder for the
State/respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Ajay Singh
Bisht, Advocate for the respondent no.3.
(2.) On 19.03.2012, the Court had passed the
" Sri Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate for the petitioner.
Sri Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the
State/respondents nos.1 and 2.
In spite of specific direction by the Court in its order
dated 28.12.2011, no supplementary counter affidavit
has been filed indicating the steps taken by the
respondents for arrangement of necessary funds for the
retired employees nor pension has been paid to the
petitioner from August, 2011 onwards.
This is a serious matter. Consequently, the
Secretary, Urban Development, Dehradun, is directed to
appear before the Court and show cause as to why he
should not be suspended.
List on 9th
(3.) Today, the Secretary, Urban Development,
Dehradun was required to appear in person and show
cause as to why an order of suspension should not be
passed against him.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.