INDER PAL Vs. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL & OTHERS
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
State of Uttaranchal and others
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) This criminal revision is directed against the
judgment and order dated 16.12.2004, passed by the Special
Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar in Criminal Complaint Case No.
364/2004, Inder Pal v. State of Uttaranchal & Others, whereby
the accused respondents, namely, Chandra, Puran and Arvind
have been acquitted from the charges of offences punishable
under Section 323, 504, 506 IPC.
(2.) None has turned up on behalf of the revisionist even
in the second revised call. Hence, hearing has been accorded to
Smt. Mamta Bisht, AGA, for the State and Mr. Mohd. Umar,
Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Navneet Kaushik, Advocate, for
the accused respondents. Also perused the lower court record
and the grounds of revision.
(3.) A perusal of the impugned judgment and order
reveals that only two fact witnesses were examined before the
court below, who were acquainted with the accused persons.
These witnesses did not name the accused persons in evidence
before the trial court. It was enough to acquit the accused
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.