YATISH PANT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Click here to view full judgement.
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J. -
(1.) THE petitioners are employees of Department of Agricultural and
Rural Development. They were sent on deputation to the Watershed
Management Directorate, Uttarakhand. We have perused the impugned order
dated 08.05.2012, which shows that the petitioners were asked to
repatriate to their parent department. It is this order, which the
petitioners have challenged before the learned Single Judge of this Court
by way of filing Writ Petition No. 634 of 2012, which was dismissed vide
order dated 17.05.2012 on the ground that the petitioners have no lien on
the post on which they were sent on deputation.
(2.) AGGRIEVED , the petitioners have filed present special appeal.
(3.) HEARD Mr. Lalit Belwal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has invited our attention towards the impugned order dated 08.05.2012 by which the deputation
period of the petitioner has been withdrawn, whereas many employees of
the Agricultural and Rural Department are still working in the Watershed
Management Directorate on deputation and they are adopting the pick an
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.