ASUTOSH BACHHAR Vs. JARNAIL SINGH
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Click here to view full judgement.
B.S.VERMA, J. -
(1.) SERVICE report shows that notices were issued to respondents
through registered post on 23 -8 -2012. The envelope sent to respondent
No.1 has neither received back undelivered nor any power has been filed
on his behalf. More than 30 days have elapsed. Therefore, service is
presumed sufficient upon the respondent No.1.
(2.) IN respect of respondent No.2 undelivered envelope was received back with the report that addressee was not found at given
address. Since the respondent No.2 has no interest in the land in suit,
and he has been arrayed as proforma respondent and hence he need
(3.) HEARD Sri S.K. Mandal, Advocate on behalf of the petitioner.
By means of this petition the petitioner has sought quashing of judgment and order dated 13 -7 - 2012 passed by the District Judge,
Udham Singh Nagar, in Civil Revision No. 71 of 2012, Jarnail Singh V s.
Asuthosh Bachhar and others.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.