SAVITA PRASAD NAUTIYAL Vs. MANAGING DIRECTOR
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND (AT: NAINITAL)
Savita Prasad Nautiyal
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Heard Mr. C. D. Bahuguna, the learned senior counsel for
the petitioner and Mr. Lalit Samant, the learned counsel for the
(2.) The petitioner was a permanent employee of the Garhwal
Anusuchit Janjati Vikas Nigam Ltd. In the year 1991, the
petitioner was suspended on the charges that he was careless in
his duties. Subsequently, a chargesheet dated 11.02.1992 was
served in which there were three charges against the petitioner.
(3.) The petitioner submitted his reply, which was not found
satisfactory and, consequently, an enquiry officer was appointed
to conduct the enquiry proceedings. The enquiry officer, after
giving full opportunity to the petitioner to defend himself,
submitted the enquiry report holding that all three charges stood
proved against the petitioner. On the basis of this enquiry report,
the petitioner was issued a show cause notice and, thereafter, the
disciplinary authority passed an order dated 23.02.1993
awarding the petitioner a major punishment of removal from
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.