SUBHAN,S/O SRI HAKIM Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Subhan,S/O Sri Hakim,Hakim Ahmad S/O Faridan Ahmad,Sarvari Khatun, W/O Hakim Ahmad,Nargish D/O Hakim Ahmad,Rahman S/O Hakim Ahmad,Mustakim S/O Hakim Ahmad,Mulsalim S/O Hakim Ahmad
State Of Uttarakhand Through Chief Secretary,Senior Superintendent Of Police, Police Station Pantnagar, District-Udham Singh Nagar.,Shamsun Nisha, D/O Hanif
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) HEARD .
(2.) BY means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the
petitioners have sought quashing of first information
report dated 03.12.2012, registered as F.I.R. No.
136 of 2012, relating to offences punishable under section 147, 323, 504, 506, 498-A of I.P.C., and one
punishable under Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act,
1961, registered at Police Station Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the complainant (respondent no. 3)
Shamsun Nisha has moved one after another
complaints to harass the petitioners due to the
matrimonial discord between her and her husband
(Subhan, petitioner no. 1).
(3.) IT is pointed out that petitioner no. 2 father-in-law, petitioner no. 3 is mother-in-law,
petitioner no. 4 is married sister-in-law, petitioner
no. 5 and petitioner no. 6 are brothers-in-law of the
complainant (respondent no. 3). It is pleaded that all
of them have been falsely implicated by abusing
process of law.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.