GOVIND Vs. JUDGE FAMILY COURT DEHRADUN & ANOTHER
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Judge Family Court Dehradun And Another
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Having heard the learned counsel for the revisionist, it is
apparent that respondent no.2 Ram Asrey is the father
whereas, revisionist Govind is his real son. Respondent no.2
moved an application u/s 125 Cr.P.C., seeking maintenance to
the tune of Rs.5,000/- per month from his son, as also
Rs.40,000/- to get the medical treatment of the eyes of his wife
Smt. Raghurai. It was averred that he is an old man aged
about 70 years and also a heart patient. He also stated that
because of lack of funds, he could not get the medical
treatment of his wife, as a result of which she became blind. It
was further averred that his son Govind, aged about 45 years,
used to abuse and assault him and also extends torture in
sundry ways. Lastly, it was stated that revisionist earns about
Rs.20,000/- per month from doing a canteen business.
(2.) Judgment of the trial court makes it abundantly clear
that the defendant appeared but did not file any written
statement or objections before the court, so the learned Family
Judge, Dehradun heard his oral submissions and also
perused the evidence adduced by his father Ram Asre.
(3.) Learned Family Judge passed the impugned order, granting
maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month as well as
Rs.15,000/- for the operation of the eyes of Smt. Raghurai. This judgment has been assailed by way of the instant
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.