HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND (AT: NAINITAL)
Click here to view full judgement.
(2.) By means of this petition moved under section 482 of
Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dated
13.08.2007, passed by Judge Family Court, Hardwar, on an
application under section 125 of Cr.P.C., filed by
respondent Neetu against the present petitioner Badal
(husband), whereby said court has directed the
present petitioner to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs
1,500/- per month to his wife.
(3.) From the perusal of the aforesaid impugned
order it appears that it was a final order passed under
section 125 of Cr.P.C., against which revision was
maintainable. No revision appears to have been filed.
As such, the aforesaid impugned order stood final.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.