HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Ramesh And Others
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) None has turned up either on behalf the
revisionist or the accused respondents. Hence, this Court
extended hearing to Mr. Sohail Siddiqui, AGA, for the State.
Also perused the papers available on record.
(2.) This revision has been filed against the judgment
and order of acquittal dated 3.9.2004, passed by the learned
Additional Sessions/FTC I, Dehradun in Sessions Trial No.
272/2000, State v. Ramesh & 4 Others, whereby all the
accused respondents, namely, Ramesh, Rajesh, Shivcharan,
Smt. Rajjo Devi and Smt. Sheetal Devi have been acquitted
from the charge of offences levelled against them under
Section 363, 366, 376 IPC.
(3.) It was alleged that Km. Arti was enticed away by
the accused respondents in order to marry her with one of
the accused persons, namely, Shivcharan. Having perused
the impugned judgment and order, it reflects that Km. Arti
herself has disclosed before the trial court that she
accompanied Shivcharan out of her own sweet volition. None
had enticed her away. She has also stated that her parents
wanted to marry her elsewhere against her wishes. At that
time, she was at the verge of completing 18 years of age. 2
These were the major grounds for recording the finding of
acquittal by the learned trial court.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.