PARIPURNA NAND NAITHANI Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & OTHERS
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Paripurna Nand Naithani
State of Uttarakhand and others
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the
applicant is kept with the record. Application made
therefor (IA 4027/2012) is disposed of.
(2.) Heard learned Counsel for the parties and
perused the papers on record.
(3.) Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, it
is evidently clear that Deepak Mangwal (respondent no. 2),
who has lodged the FIR, is a practicing Advocate at
Dehradoon Courts. It is alleged that he is so influential
that no Advocate at the District Headquarters dares to
contest the case against Mr. Mangwal. As such, no
Advocate is ready to defend the applicant Paripurna Nand
Nainthani and other accused persons.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.