SURENDRA KUMAR SAXENA Vs. RENU SAENA
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND (AT: NAINITAL)
SURENDRA KUMAR SAXENA
Click here to view full judgement.
(2.) This revision is directed against the judgment
and order dated 02.07.2011, passed by Judge
Family Court, Udham Singh Nagar, in Criminal
Misc. Case No. 279 of 2009, whereby said court
has enhanced the maintenance directed to be paid
by the revisionist (husband) to his wife Renu
Saxena (respondent no.1), at the rate of Rs. 2,000/-
per month, and daughter Km. Vanshika
(respondent no.2, minor) at the rate of Rs. 1,000/-
(3.) Brief facts of the case, are that, the
revisionist got married to the respondent no.1
Renu Saxena, in the year 2003, and a daughter
Vanshika (respondent no.2) born out of the
wedlock. The respondents moved an application
under section 125 of Cr.P.C., in the year 2005,
which was registered as Misc. Case No. 207 of
2005. After recording the evidence and hearing
the parties, the trial court appears to have directed
the present revisionist to pay maintenance at the
rate of Rs. 1,200/- per month to his wife, and Rs.
600/- per month to his minor daughter, vide order
dated 27.10.2006. In the year 2009, the
respondents moved an application under section
127 of Cr.P.C., for enhancement of the amount of
maintenance on the ground that the revised pay of
the revisionist has gone up Rs. 10,000/- per month.
After hearing the parties, and recording of the
evidence the trial court enhanced the amount of
Rs. 1,200/- to Rs. 2,000/-, and Rs. 600 per month to Rs.
1,000/- per month as maintenance payable by the
revisionist to his wife and the daughter
respectively. Aggrieved by said order dated
02.07.2011, this revision is filed.;
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.