HARPAL SINGH & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANOTHER
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HARPAL SINGH And ANOTHER
State of Uttarakhand and another
Click here to view full judgement.
(1.) Present compounding application (CRMA
1136/2012) has been jointly moved by the applicants and
the complainant. Applicant Harpal Singh and complainant
Smt. Veera Rani are present in person before this Court.
Compounding application is duly supported by the
affidavits of the parties.
(2.) Heard. Also perused the papers on record.
(3.) Facts, in brief, are that initially Mr. Amar Iqbal
Singh executed a sale deed of Khasra No. 7 for certain
consideration in favour of complainant Smt. Veera Rani.
At another point of time, Amar Iqbal Singh drafted a sale
deed in favour of the applicant no. 1 Harpal Singh and it
was purported that the same is being done for Khasra No.
6. But mischievously, Mr. Amar Iqbal Singh mentioned the
boundaries of Khasra No. 6 as exactly the same which
were of Khasra No. 7, already sold to Smt. Veera Rani.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.