JUDGEMENT
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN,J. -
(1.) The plaintiff in O.S.No.9/2006 Sri.Muraleedharan is the appellant in this appeal.
(2.) Sri.Muraleedharan assails the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Court, Palakkad in O.S.No./2006, which had
been filed by him against the respondent herein - Smt.V.P.Mary
seeking specific performance of an agreement of sale between
them, as per which, he had agreed to buy the plaint schedule
property, comprised of 1.66 Acres for an amount of
Rs.3,50,000/-.
(3.) According to the appellant, the agreement to sell, namely Ext.A1, was executed on 07.06.2004, on which day, he
paid an advance of Rs.30,000/-, which was accepted by
Smt.V.P.Mary. He says that the time for performance of the
agreement was fixed as on or before 05.09.2004; but that on
20.02.2004, on mutual consent, a further amount of Rs.50,000/- was paid by him towards advance and the agreement stood
extended until 22.02.2005. He says that even though the term of
the agreement stood so extended, no action had been taken by
Smt.V.P.Mary to provide the originals of the title deeds or the
encumbrance certificate and such other due diligence papers
until January, 2005; but that instead of doing so, she caused a
notice to be issued to him on 28.01.2005, a copy of which has
been marked on record as Ext.A2, however, without mentioning
the fact that she had received an additional advance of
Rs.50,000/-.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.