Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. - (1.)The petitioner seeks Bail in case FIR No. 237/2017 under Sections 376/323/506/34 IPC, Police Station South-Rohini.
(2.)The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner on the pretext of marriage developed relationship with the complainant. It is contended that there is also a child born from the relationship between the petitioner and the complainant. The petitioner is stated to have brought the complainant to his parental house to live with him in Delhi and they resided together for nearly six years.
(3.)Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner had got married with the complainant as far back as on 101.2011 and there are documents to evidence the fact that the petitioner has always been acknowledging the complainant as his wife. It is contended that even all documents of the complainant show that she has been showing herself as wife of the petitioner. Reference is drawn to the Birth Certificate of the child which shows the date of the registration of birth as 112.2011 in which the petitioner is shown as the father and the complainant as the mother of the child. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the parties got remarried on 22.09.2017, pursuant to the order of the Trial Court dated 14.09.2017.