KRISHAN Vs. STATE OF DELHI
LAWS(DLH)-1983-11-43
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decided on November 11,1983

KRISHAN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

PHOOL KUMAR VS. DELHI ADMINISTRATION [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH VS. WAZIR CHAND [REFERRED TO]
BALAK RAM VS. STATE [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

JITENDER VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2012-7-367] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH ALIAS TILLU VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2003-11-128] [REFERRED TO]
KALU ALIAS SALEEM VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2012-12-128] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

M.L.Jain, J. - (1.)This judgment will dispose of Cr. A. 23/83 and Cr. A. 68/83. The appellants were convicted under section 392 and sentenced with the aid of section 397 Indian Penal Code to rigorous imprisonment for seven years. Hence, these appeals.
(2.)On 4.10.1981 at about 3.00 p.m. the accused appellants threatened Ram Sumer (P.W. 4) near the public latrine in Subzi Mandi with knives and relieved him of a purse which contained Rs. 73/- and two receipts. When accused had gone about 20 paces, Ram Sumer raised an alarm. The public chased the accused, apprehended them and recovered knives. Ram Sumer snatched his purse from accused Bishan. The public had also given beatings to the accused persons. In the meanwhile, the police had been informed by one Ganga Ram Pradhan. S.I. Om Prakash (P.W. 5) came and arrested the accused who were smelling of liquor. Ram Sumer produced before him the purse, currency notes and receipts. He also got the accused examined by a medical officer. Shiv Dayal (P. W. 1) corroborated the version of Ram Sumer.
(3.)The case of the accused Bishan is that Ganga Ram Pradhan was inimical to Bishan and he falsely implicated him. The case of Lalla accused is that he had consumed some liquor and was standing amongst the spectators.
;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.