ARVIND S/O MAHENDRA KHUNTE Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
LAWS(CHH)-2017-5-124
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH (AT: BILASPUR)
Decided on May 17,2017

Arvind S/O Mahendra Khunte Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. - (1.) This petition is against the order dated 4.4.2017 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dabhara, District Janjgir Champa in Criminal Case No.82 of 2011 (State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Arvind and others) by which application filed by the parties for compounding the offence under Section 320 of the CrPC has been rejected holding that offence under Section 498A of the IPC is not compoundable.
(2.) Facts of the case are that marriage of respondent No.2/complainant was solemnized with petitioner No.1 on 23.2.2009. Petitioner No.2 is father-in-law, petitioner No.3 is grandfather-in-law, petitioner No.4 is mother-in-law and petitioner No.5 is grandmother-in-law of respondent No.2. F.I.R. was lodged by respondent No.2 on 25.3.2011 against the petitioners alleging that they are treating her with cruelty and demanding dowry, pursuant to which, Crime F.I.R. No.54/2011 was registered at Police Station Dabhara, District Janjgir-Champa for commission of offence under Section 498A/34 of the IPC and they were charge-sheeted before the jurisdictional Criminal Court.
(3.) During pendency of the criminal case, both the parties have filed an application under Section 320 (8) of the CrPC for compounding the offence stating inter-alia that they have settled their disputes amicably, therefore, criminal case be dropped. The said application was dismissed by the trial Court holding that offence under Section 498A of the IPC is not compoundable and therefore, the Court has no jurisdiction to direct for compounding of the offence.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.