JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) These petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, raise an interesting issue as to whether
the period of limitation provided in the Service Rules for
initiation of judicial proceedings would apply in cases where
criminal proceedings are sought to be launched against
retired public servants, especially to proceedings initiated
under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter
referred to as 'P.C. Act for short').
(2.) The petitioners in these batch of petitions were working in the Regional Transport Offices at various places in
the State and in various capacities such as First Division
Assistant, Office Superintendent etc. It appears that Sri
B.N.Jagadeesh (one of the respondents) presented a private
complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure on 06.08.2012 against unknown persons, alleging
that many Officers in the Department of Customs, Regional
Transport Offices in Karnataka had nexus with dealers of
vehicles, middlemen and owners of imported vehicles and
were involved in multi-crore racket causing loss to the
exchequer. It was alleged in the complaint that vehicles are
brought to India by illegal means by fabricating and
manipulating the Bill of Entry, Bill of Lading etc. and are
presented before the Custom officials and in collusion with
the Custom officials, such imported vehicles were brought
into India on short payment of custom duty and thereafter
with the connivance of the officials in the RTOs again short
payment of duty/taxes were made, thereby causing huge
revenue loss to the exchequer. Therefore, criminal
prosecution was sought to be initiated under the provisions of
the Prevention of Corruption Act and Indian Penal Code.
(3.) The learned Magistrate/Special Judge for Prevention of Corruption referred the complaint for investigation to the
Superintendent of Police, Lokayukta under Section 156 (3) of
Cr.P.C. Pursuant to the order of investigation, the Deputy
Superintendent of Police registered FIRs under Sections 8 and
12 of P.C. Act. The petitioners were asked to appear before the Lokayukta Police and submit their reply with reference to
the vehicle, along with particulars where it was alleged that
there was short levy of penalty/duty/tax.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.