MAHARANA MILLS PVT LIMITED Vs. INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD
LAWS(SC)-1989-5-16
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: GUJARAT)
Decided on May 03,1989

MAHARANA MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED Appellant
VERSUS
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL,AHMEDABAD Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Kania, J. - (1.) This is an appeal from the Judgment of a Division of the High Court of Gujarat in Special Civil Appln. No. 1797 of 1972 on a certificate granted under Article 133(1) of the Constitution of India. The relevant facts are as follows:-
(2.) The assessee is a Private Limited Company and carries on the business of manufacturing and selling textiles at Porbundar in Saurashtra in the Gujarat State. Before 1948 Porbundar was a part of the Princely State of that name. No Income-tax was levied by the erstwhile Porbundar State prior to 1948. In 1948 there was a merger of several princely States and as a result of the merger, the State of Saurashtra was formed. No income-tax was levied by the State of Saurashtra till 1949 when it promulgated the Saurashtra Income-tax Ordinance. Under that Ordinance provision was made for the grant of depreciation allowance based on the written down value. The said Ordinance defined "written down value" as follows: "Written down value" means:- (a) in case of assets acquired in the previous year, the actual cost to the assessee; and (b) in the case of assets acquired before the previous year the actual cost to the assessee less all depreciation actually allowed to him under this Ordinance or allowed under any Act repealed thereby or which would have been allowed to him if the Income Tax Act, 1922 was in force in past.
(3.) On 26th January, 1950 State of Saurashtra became a part of Union of India as a Part B State. The Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 became applicable to the State of Saurashtra from 1st April, 1950 under the provisions of the Finance Act, 1950. By Section 13 of the Finance Act of 1950, which provides for repeals and savings, the Saurashtra Income-tax Ordinance was repealed. Section 12 of that Act provided for the removal of difficulties as follows: "If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of any of the Acts, rules or orders extended by Section 3 or Section 11 to any State or merged territory, the Central Government may, by order, make such provision, or give such direction, as appears to it to be necessary for removing, the difficulty.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.