JUDGEMENT
L.NAGESWARA RAO, J. -
(1.) The Appellant was enrolled in the Indian Army on 27.07.2000 in the Corps of Signals. When he was posted with the 9th Corps Air Support Signal Unit (CASSU), he was
charged for disobedience of lawful command given by his
Company Havaldar Major (CHM) Pramod Kumar. The
charges communicated to the Appellant are as follows:
First charge
"Army Act Section 41(2)
DISOBEYING A LAWFUL COMMAND GIVEN BY
HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER IN THAT HE, at Yol Cantonment, on 30 July 2009, when ordered by his Section Non Commissioned Officer Number
15361 420F Company Havaldar Major (Operator Cipher) Parmod Kumar of the same unit to perform the duties as Detachment Incharge of the unit Radio Monitoring Detachment from 1900 hrs. to 2359 hrs. on 30 July 2009 did not do so.
Second charge
Army Act Section 41 (2) DISOBEYING A LAWFUL COMMAND GIVEN BY HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER IN THAT HE, at Yol Cantonment, on 03 August 2009, when his
Section Non Commissioned Officer Number 15361 420F Company Havaldar Major (Operator Cipher) Parmod Kumar of the same
unit ordered him to perform the duties as the Detachment In-charge of the unit Radio Monitoring Detachment from 1900 hrs. to 2359
hrs. on 03 August 2009, failed to report to the Radio Department."
(2.) The Appellant denied the charges. Proceedings were initiated before the Summary Court Martial. Company
Havaldar Major Pramod Kumar of Operation Section, 9th
Corps deposed before the Summary Court Martial that the
Appellant failed to perform the duty of Operator-cumDetachment In-charge of the Radio Monitoring Detachment
Unit from 1900 hrs. to 2359 hrs. on 30.07.2009. As the
Appellant did not report for duty as directed by him,
Company Havaldar Major Pramod Kumar went to the
Barrack and directed the Appellant to explain the
reason for not reporting for duty. Thereafter, Pramod
Kumar himself performed the duties of Detachment InCharge during that night. The Appellant again absented
himself from duty in spite of directions issued on
03.08.2009. The Appellant was marched up to the Commanding Officer, Colonel Rajiv Sud on 06.08.2009.
Tentative charges were framed and explained to the
Appellant. The Appellant refused to sign Appendix 'A ' as
directed by the Commanding Officer.
(3.) By an order dated 26.08.2009, the service of the Appellant was terminated on the basis of the findings
recorded in the Summary Court Martial. He preferred an
appeal to Respondent No.4 which was dismissed by an
order dated 16.02.2010. Thereafter, the Appellant filed a
Writ Petition in the Calcutta High Court which was
transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal, Kolkata Bench.
By the impugned order, the Armed Forces Tribunal upheld
the order of termination of service of the Appellant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.