JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Mr. V.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. Shubham Bhalla, AOR, for the respondents no.1 and 2 seeks
permission of the Court to withdraw from the case. Permission is
granted since Mr. Parthov Sarkar, learned counsel, has put an
appearance on behalf of respondents no.1 and 2.
Respondent No.3, who has appeared in person, states that the
Registry has not given complete copy of the annexures to him.
Registry is directed to handover the copy of annexures today itself
by 4 p.m. to the respondent No.3. The respondents no.1, 2 and 3 are
directed to file their reply to the petition within three weeks
from today.
(2.) List on 30.09.2019. On that date all the contemnors shall remain present in-person.
(3.) An application has been moved by respondent No.4 Mr. Mathews Nedumpara for discharge. This contempt was registered basically on
the joint complaint filed by the President of the Bombay Bar
Association and the President of the Bombay Incorporated Law
Society. In this complaint reference has been made to a
communication (sent by respondents no.1 and 2) and the allegation
against respondents no.3 and 4 is that they have acted in tandem
with respondents no.1 and 2. Other than this allegation, there is
no other material to show that respondent no.4 connived with
respondents no.1 and 2.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.