JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Leave granted in SLP (C) Nos.12632 of 2018 and 27440 of 2018.
(2.) The writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 36(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ('ID Act') was
dismissed by the High Court, aggrieved by which
the above appeal is filed. The High Court relied
upon a judgment of this Court in Paradip Port Trust, Paradip versus Their Workmen [(1977) 2 SCC 339] to hold that Section 36(4) of the ID Act has been interpreted by this Court. The High Court was
also of the opinion that Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961 which was relied upon by the
appellant was also taken into consideration by
this Court.
(3.) Writ Petition (Civil) 1169 of 2018 is filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India
assailing the vires of Section 36(4) of the ID
Act. Civil Appeal No. 6587 of 2019 is filed
against the order of the Labour Court dismissing
the application filed by the appellant seeking
permission to engage an advocate.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.