JUDGEMENT
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. -
(1.) Marriages are said to be made in heaven. They are broken on earth. We are faced with a scenario where for the better part of almost
two decades, the parties before us, who are husband and wife, have been
engaged in multifarious litigation, including a divorce proceeding, which
forms subject matter of the appeal before us.
(2.) The marriage between the parties was solemnized at Jalandhar according to Hindu rites on 23.4.2000, where apparently the family of the
appellant was based. The family of the respondent is stated to have been
based in Canada. It appears from the allegations that the constant period
of stay of the parties was only for about two months, with the respondent
moving back and forth, but, undisputedly on 24.5.2001, the respondent
left for Canada to be with her family. It is the case of the appellant that
this was not with his consent, while on the other hand it is the case of the
respondent that she was making an endeavour for immigration of the
appellant to Canada, and at his behest. The respondent did not return to
India till 16.8.2002, which was soon after she obtained Canadian
citizenship on 6.8.2002. It is also an admitted position that during this
time, no papers were filed with the Canadian authorities for immigration
of the appellant and that the respondent puts the blame on incomplete
papers sent by the appellant. As to why the papers could not be
completed over such a long period of time is a moot point. It does appear
that the respondent was apparently interested in Canadian citizenship and
only after having achieved that, came back to India.
(3.) The parties resided for barely two and a half months together, when a fight is stated to have broken out between the parties and the
respondent again left the company of the appellant. There was an
intervention by the Panchayat and the parties were asked to reside
separately from their family, in a rented accommodation, but that too did
not last for more than a couple of months. The respondent is stated to
have left the common residence on 15.4.2003 after an altercation and
then again left for Canada.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.